Difference between revisions of "Centre for Policy Studies"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
(Pro-Fracking)
(34 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The free market think tank set up by Sir [[Keith Joseph]] which is most associated with the rise of [[Margaret Thatcher]].
+
[[File:Centre for Policy Studies.JPG|right|thumb|270px|CPS, 57 [[Tufton Street]], Westminster - next door to think-tank [[Civitas]]]]
 +
The [[Centre for Policy Studies]] is the free market think tank set up by Sir [[Keith Joseph]] which is most associated with the rise of [[Margaret Thatcher]]. During [[Margaret Thatcher]]'s tenure as Prime Minister, the CPS enjoyed a considerable influence over policy, which declined rapidly following the departure of Keith Joseph from government in 1986, and Thatcher's removal in 1990.
  
It was set up in 1974 by [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Keith Joseph]] and [[Alfred Sherman]].  Keith Joseph, who was head of policy at the [[Conservative Party]] between 1975 and its successful election in 1979, was strongly influenced by the [[Institute of Economic Affairs]].  He helped set up the CPS as a kind of politicized version of the IEA, with the aim of promulgating its ideals around the political establishment -- in particular, around the [[Conservative Party]] [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/int_ralphharris.html].
+
The CPS 'develops and publishes public policy proposals and arranges seminars and lectures on topical policy issues, as part of its mission to influence policy around the world. It also maintains a range of informal contacts with politicians, policymakers, civil servants and the press, in Britain and abroad' and 'can claim a large share of the credit for initiating policies such as privatisation, trade union reform, council house sales, pensions deregulation, education reform, free trade, health service reform and the recent restructuring of the tax system to favour traditional families.'
 
 
During [[Margaret Thatcher]]'s tenure as Prime Minister, the CPS enjoyed a considerable influence over policy, which declined rapidly following the departure of Keith Joseph from government in 1986, and Thatcher's removal in 1990.
 
 
 
The CPS 'develops and publishes public policy proposals and arranges seminars and lectures on topical policy issues, as part of its mission to influence policy around the world. It also maintains a range of informal contacts with politicians, policymakers, civil servants and the press, in Britain and abroad.' and 'can claim a large share of the credit for initiating policies such as privatisation, trade union reform, council house sales, pensions deregulation, education reform, free trade, health service reform and the recent restructuring of the tax system to favour traditional families.'
 
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
 
+
CPS was set up in 1974 by [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Keith Joseph]] and [[Alfred Sherman]]. Sir [[Keith Joseph]] was the founder of the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) and the President was [[Margaret Thatcher]].  The full-time director was [[Alfred Sherman]], who had started his political life on the extreme left. Keith Joseph, who was head of policy at the [[Conservative Party]] between 1975 and its successful election in 1979, was strongly influenced by the [[Institute of Economic Affairs]]. He helped set up the CPS as a kind of politicized version of the IEA, with the aim of promulgating its ideals around the political establishment - in particular, around the [[Conservative Party]]. <ref>PBS, Command Heights, [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/int_ralphharris.html Interview with Lord Ralph Harris, 17 July 2000].</ref> Some controversy surrounds the way the CPS was set up:
 
 
Sir [[Keith Joseph]] was the founder of the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) and the President was [[Margaret Thatcher]].  The full-time director was [[Alfred Sherman]], who had started his political life on the extreme left. Some controversy surrounds the way the CPS was set up:
 
  
 
:It was a fraud.  Keith Joseph went to Ted and asked his permission to set up a fund to see how private enterprise worked in other countries.  Then he went round the City saying he had Heath’s permission to raise the money.  Then it became the Joseph/Thatcher power base for attacking everything Ted stood for.<ref>Keegan, W. (1984) ''Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment'', Penguin: 47</ref>
 
:It was a fraud.  Keith Joseph went to Ted and asked his permission to set up a fund to see how private enterprise worked in other countries.  Then he went round the City saying he had Heath’s permission to raise the money.  Then it became the Joseph/Thatcher power base for attacking everything Ted stood for.<ref>Keegan, W. (1984) ''Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment'', Penguin: 47</ref>
  
This key alliance between Thatcher and Joseph, urged on by Sherman, is traced as the origin of Thatcher’s famous interest in a monetarist economic policy together with.  The CPS very quickly became the centre for the propagation of anti-Heath views — notoriously stage-managed at Joseph’s Preston Town Hall Speech on September 1974, which advocated greater unemployment to tackle inflation — as a challenge to his leadership.  
+
The CPS very quickly became the centre for the propagation of anti-Heath views — notoriously stage-managed at Joseph’s Preston Town Hall Speech on September 1974, which advocated greater unemployment to tackle inflation — as a challenge to his leadership.  
  
With Offices in Westminster it was the base for publishing books and pamphlets on monetarism and right-wing ideology, the speeches of Thatcher and Joseph, [[Samuel Brittan]] and others.
+
With offices in Westminster it was the base for publishing books and pamphlets on monetarism and right-wing ideology, the speeches of Thatcher and Joseph, [[Samuel Brittan]] and others. According to the ''Guardian'': ‘In those “heroic” days it was little more than an office employing Sherman to draft speeches for Joseph. It attracted a number of people who had not been active Tories but became influential later, notably [[David Young]] (later Lord Young of Graffham) and [[John Hoskyns|John (later Sir) Hoskyns]].’ <ref>‘[http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2006/aug/29/guardianobituaries.conservatives Sir Alfred Sherman – Adviser who preached Thatcherism before the term was invented]’, ''Guardian'', 29 August 2006</ref>
  
:The CPS became the formal political manifestation of the ideology that had so far been propagated by the nominally independent [[Institute for Economic Affairs]].  Both were in the propaganda business.  Both had offices in relatively unassuming private houses in S.W.1.  Both poured out a stream of publications designed partly to reassure the faithful but first and foremost to proselytize.<ref>Keegan, W. (1984) ''Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment'', Penguin: 60</ref>  
+
:The CPS became the formal political manifestation of the ideology that had so far been propagated by the nominally independent [[Institute of Economic Affairs]].  Both were in the propaganda business.  Both had offices in relatively unassuming private houses in S.W.1.  Both poured out a stream of publications designed partly to reassure the faithful but first and foremost to proselytize.<ref>Keegan, W. (1984) ''Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment'', Penguin: 60</ref>  
  
 
The CPS concentrated its propaganda on the universities, while the IEA tried to influence ‘Fleet Street’ and the City.  The “economics” propounded by the IEA, which were openly taken up by the  Conservative government in 1982, were, inter alia:  
 
The CPS concentrated its propaganda on the universities, while the IEA tried to influence ‘Fleet Street’ and the City.  The “economics” propounded by the IEA, which were openly taken up by the  Conservative government in 1982, were, inter alia:  
Line 24: Line 19:
 
:… more denationalisation of industry; an extension of private medicine; the introduction of education vouchers...; and more anti-union legislation.<ref>Keegan, W. (1984) ''Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment'', Penguin: ??</ref>
 
:… more denationalisation of industry; an extension of private medicine; the introduction of education vouchers...; and more anti-union legislation.<ref>Keegan, W. (1984) ''Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment'', Penguin: ??</ref>
  
Founded in the 1950s by Lord Ralph Harris, the IEA was the first organisation in the UK to publish Milton Friedman’s monetarist economics.  According to investigative journalists it later took an active part in the cabals which covertly drove the Conservative party rightwards in the 1970s, in alliance with the ultras in the Secret Service. (Dorril & Ramsay, 1991: 224 – 228) [[Arthur Seldon]], deputy for Lord Harris wrote a book with the notorious MI6/CIA operative, [[Brian Crozier]], who was involved in various nefarious covert operations through pan-European far right organisations such as “the 61” and the Pinay Circle.  Lord Harris himself shared a platform with Crozier and [[John Gouriet]] of the [[Freedom Association]] (founded by the McWhirter twins) addressing the officers of the Army Staff College at Camberly circa 1975.  This was an effort to encourage direct military intervention against “internal subversion (i.e. the left).<ref>Crozier, B. R. (1993) ''Free Agent'', Harper Collins. 122</ref>  
+
Founded in the 1950s by Lord Ralph Harris, the IEA was the first organisation in the UK to publish [[Milton Friedman]]’s monetarist economics.  According to investigative journalists it later took an active part in the cabals which covertly drove the Conservative party rightwards in the 1970s, in alliance with the ultras in the Secret Service.<ref>Dorril, S. & Ramsay, R. (1991) ''Smear!,'' 4th Estate: 224 – 228</ref> [[Arthur Seldon]], deputy for Lord Harris wrote a book with the notorious MI6/CIA operative, [[Brian Crozier]], who was involved in various nefarious covert operations through pan-European far right organisations such as “the 61” and the [[Pinay Circle]].  Lord Harris himself shared a platform with Crozier and [[John Gouriet]] of the [[Freedom Association]] (founded by the McWhirter twins) addressing the officers of the Army Staff College at Camberly circa 1975.  This was an effort to encourage direct military intervention against “internal subversion (i.e. the left).<ref>Crozier, B. R. (1993) ''Free Agent'', Harper Collins. 122</ref>  
  
The IEA are well known for their work in the field of privatisation.  It was they who commissioned [[Stephen Littlechild]] in 1981 to write the paper “Ten steps to denationalisation,” Littlechild later became one of the four “regulators” who overseen 20% of the UK’s GDP in the form of the four utilities Gas, Water, Electricity and Telecommunications.  They also influenced the Conservative Government’s minimum wage policy, (Sunday Times, 1995) promoted the notion that “non-traditional” families (i.e. black and Asian) produce more delinquent children and advocating that “student loans should be charged at a higher rate of interest.”<ref>Financial Times 9/1/95.</ref> Mrs Thatcher herself stated that:
+
The IEA are well known for their work in the field of privatisation.  It was they who commissioned [[Stephen Littlechild]] in 1981 to write the paper “Ten steps to denationalisation,” Littlechild later became one of the four “regulators” who overseen 20% of the UK’s GDP in the form of the four utilities Gas, Water, Electricity and Telecommunications.  They also influenced the Conservative Government’s minimum wage policy,<ref>Sunday Times 19/2/95.</ref> promoted the notion that “non-traditional” families (i.e. black and Asian) produce more delinquent children and advocating that “student loans should be charged at a higher rate of interest.”<ref>Financial Times 9/1/95.</ref> Mrs Thatcher herself stated that:
  
 
:What we have achieved could never have been done without the leadership of the IEA.<ref>Spectator 23/4/88</ref>
 
:What we have achieved could never have been done without the leadership of the IEA.<ref>Spectator 23/4/88</ref>
  
== Modern Times ==
+
In a March 2009 presentation [[Tim Montgomerie]] and [[Matthew Elliott]] described CPS as part of the infrastructure of the [[Movement Conservatism|conservative movement]] in Britain.<ref>Tim Montgomerie, [http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2009/03/the-growth-of-b.html The growth of Britain's conservative movement], ConservativeHome, 14 March 2009.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Funding==
 +
The [[Institute for Policy Research]]'s 2005 Accounts reveal grants to CPS for £157,000.<ref name="AnnualRep2005">The Institute for Policy Research ''Report and Accounts'', Year ended 30 September 2005, Charity number 285143. Accessible via: http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/DocumentList.aspx?RegisteredCharityNumber=285143&SubsidiaryNumber=0&DocType=AccountList</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Climate Change ==
  
In the Telegraph in 2006, Ruth Lea, the director of the CPS, suggested that we need not worry about climate change because, when the earth’s climate changed before, it gave rise to civilization (Lea, 2006).  She was denounced by the man whose research she claimed to be championing. Nick Brooks of the University of East Anglia suggested that she had wilfully misinterpreted his work. “The distortion of science for ideological purposes,” he wrote, “has a long history, and the results are generally ugly.”<ref>Brooks, N. (2006) ''Global Warning'', Letter to the Telegraph, September 13.</ref>
+
In the Telegraph in 2006, CPS director [[Ruth Lea]] suggested that we need not worry about climate change because, when the earth’s climate changed before, it gave rise to civilization (Lea, 2006).  She was denounced by the man whose research she claimed to be championing. Nick Brooks of the University of East Anglia suggested that she had wilfully misinterpreted his work. “The distortion of science for ideological purposes,” he wrote, “has a long history, and the results are generally ugly.”<ref>Brooks, N. (2006) ''Global Warning'', Letter to the Telegraph, September 13.</ref>
  
 
George Monbiot argued that this was part of a disinformation campaign.<ref>Monbiot, G. (2003) ''Invasion of the Entryists'', Guardian, December 9.</ref>  The Royal Society’s president, Lord Rees, sent the Telegraph what must be one of the most damning letters it has ever received.
 
George Monbiot argued that this was part of a disinformation campaign.<ref>Monbiot, G. (2003) ''Invasion of the Entryists'', Guardian, December 9.</ref>  The Royal Society’s president, Lord Rees, sent the Telegraph what must be one of the most damning letters it has ever received.
  
:In her sixth article in five months which misrepresents the science of climate change in the Business Pages of The Daily Telegraph, Ruth Lea erroneously asserts that “there is wide scientific disagreement” about the likely impact of climate change. In fact, the peer-reviewed scientific literature, of which Lea appears to be completely unaware, shows that continued growth in greenhouse gas emissions will lead to a rise in global average temperature of between 1.4 and 5.8 centigrade degrees by 2100…. (Rees, 2006)
+
:In her sixth article in five months which misrepresents the science of climate change in the Business Pages of The Daily Telegraph, Ruth Lea erroneously asserts that “there is wide scientific disagreement” about the likely impact of climate change.<ref>Lea, R. (2006) ''Costly futile gestures in the climate change debate'', The Telegraph. September 11.</ref> In fact, the peer-reviewed scientific literature, of which Lea appears to be completely unaware, shows that continued growth in greenhouse gas emissions will lead to a rise in global average temperature of between 1.4 and 5.8 centigrade degrees by 2100….<ref>Rees, Lord of Ludlow (2006) ''Letter sent to the Telegraph'', September 18.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Monbiot revealed the campaign of disinformation was started by the tobacco company [[Philip Morris]] in a convoluted attempt to distract attention from its funding of a campaign to deny the effects of tobacco by funding people to deny climate change as well.  This heavily-funded lobby has produced some odd bedfellows, such as the Revolutionary Communist party (RCP) who have traveled from the fringes of the left to the extremities of the pro-corporate libertarian right:
  
Monboit revealed the campaign of disinformation was started by the tobacco company Philip Morris in a convoluted attempt to distract attention from its funding of a campaign to deny the effects of tobacco by funding people to deny climate change as well. This heavily-funded lobby has produced some odd bedfellows, such as the Revolutionary Communist party (RCP) who have traveled from the fringes of the left to the extremities of the pro-corporate libertarian right:
+
:In 1988, it set up a magazine called Living Marxism, later LM. By this time, the organisation, led by the academic [[Frank Furedi]], the journalist [[Mick Hume]] and the teacher [[Claire Fox]], had moved overtly to the far right. LM described its mission as promoting a “confident individualism” without social constraint […] It campaigned against gun control, […] against banning tobacco advertising […] and child pornography, […] and in favour of global warming, […] human cloning and freedom for corporations. It defended the Tory MP Neil Hamilton […] and the Bosnian Serb ethnic cleansers. […] It provided a platform for writers from the corporate thinktanks the Institute for Economic Affairs […] and the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. […] Frank Furedi started writing for the Centre for Policy Studies […] and contacting the supermarket chains, offering, for £7,500, to educate their customers “about complex scientific issues”.<ref>Monbiot, G. (2003) ''Invasion of the Entryists'', Guardian, December 9.</ref>
  
:In 1988, it set up a magazine called Living Marxism, later LM. By this time, the organisation, led by the academic Frank Furedi, the journalist Mick Hume and the teacher Claire Fox, had moved overtly to the far right. LM described its mission as promoting a “confident individualism” without social constraint [] It campaigned against gun control, [] against banning tobacco advertising [] and child pornography, […] and in favour of global warming, [] human cloning and freedom for corporations. It defended the Tory MP Neil Hamilton [] and the Bosnian Serb ethnic cleansers. […] It provided a platform for writers from the corporate thinktanks the Institute for Economic Affairs […] and the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. […] Frank Furedi started writing for the Centre for Policy Studies [] and contacting the supermarket chains, offering, for £7,500, to educate their customers “about complex scientific issues”.<ref>Monbiot, G. (2003) ''Invasion of the Entryists'', Guardian, December 9.</ref>
+
==Against the Tobin Tax==
 +
In April 2012 the CPS published a report arguing against the proposed EU-wide Financial Transactions Tax, which was launched at an event entitled: Tobin Tax: golden egg or dead goose?. Participants included [[Andrew Tyrie]] MP, Chairman of the [[Treasury Select Committee]]; [[Roger Liddle]], former adviser to [[President Barroso]], [[Kay Swinburne]] MEP; [[Iain Anderson]] of [[Cicero Consulting]] and the report's author [[John Chown]] (leading tax expert and co-founder of the [[Institute for Fiscal Studies]]). <Ref> Centre for Policy Studies, [http://www.cps.org.uk/publications/reports/time-to-bin-the-tobin-tax/ Time to Bin the Tobin Tax], published 23 April 2012, accessed April 26 2012 </ref>
 +
==Pro-Fracking==
 +
{{‪Template:Fracking badge‬}}
 +
In June 2014 the think tank warned that measures in the Queen's Speech had not gone far enough to encourage investment in unconventional gas production.  It said Britain risked being 'held economic hostage by Russia' unless the country embraces fracking, given its growing dependence on foreign imports for almost every form of fossil fuel, from coal to natural gas.
 +
<ref> Andrew Critchlow [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/commodities/10885013/Get-Britain-fracking-or-be-held-hostage-by-Russia-says-think-tank.html Get Britain fracking or be held hostage by Russia, says think tank], ''The Telegraph'', 7:00PM BST 08 Jun 2014, acc 9 June 2014 </ref>
 +
 
 +
This followed its release of an earlier report by Richard and Elizabeth Muller in January 2014 which argued that serious environmentalists needed to rethink their opposition to fracking based on the immediate dangers posed by air pollution rather than the 'distant' long-term threat of global warming. <ref>RICHARD A. MULLER AND ELIZABETH A. MULLER,  [http://www.cps.org.uk/files/reports/original/131202135150-WhyEverySeriousEnvironmentalistShouldFavourFracking.pdf 'Why Every Serious Environmentalist should favour Fracking', Centre for Policy Studies, 2014 </ref>
  
 
==People==
 
==People==
===Employees===
+
 
*Chairman: [[Lord Blackwell]]
+
*Chairman: [[Lord Saatchi]]
*Director: [[Ruth Lea]]
+
*Director [[Tim Knox]] (July 2011 onwards) - Previously Editor-in-Chief <ref> Tim Montgomerie,[http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thinktankcentral/2011/07/tim-knox-is-the-new-director-of-cpsthinktank.html Tim Knox is the new Director of the Centre for Policy Studies], conservativehome, 14 July 2011, accessed 18 July 2011 </ref>
*Editor: [[Tim Knox]]
+
 
 
*Assistant to the centre: [[Lynn Craig]]
 
*Assistant to the centre: [[Lynn Craig]]
 
*Secretary: [[Jenny Nicholson]]
 
*Secretary: [[Jenny Nicholson]]
  
 
===Previous employees===
 
===Previous employees===
 +
*Chairman: [[Lord Blackwell]]
 +
*[[Jill Kirby]] (Nov 2007- January 2011)
 +
*Director: [[Ruth Lea]] (2004-07)
 
*Director: [[Tessa Keswick]]
 
*Director: [[Tessa Keswick]]
 
*Director of studies: [[Daniel Kruger]]  
 
*Director of studies: [[Daniel Kruger]]  
Line 103: Line 115:
 
*[[Lord Young]]
 
*[[Lord Young]]
  
==Links==
+
==Resources==
 
+
*PBS, Command Heights, [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/int_ralphharris.html Interview with Lord Ralph Harris, 17 July 2000]
*[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/int_ralphharris.html Commanding Heights: Interview with Ralph Harris], PBS, 07/17/00
+
*[[BBC: Centre for Policy Studies]] - page on the CPS's attacks on the [[BBC]]
 
*[http://www.cps.org.uk/ CPS website]
 
*[http://www.cps.org.uk/ CPS website]
 
+
*Stephen Dorril and Robin Ramsay, ''Smear!'', (4th Estate, 1991)
 
+
*Lea, R. (2006) 'Costly futile gestures in the climate change debate', ''Daily Telegraph'', 11 September 2006
 +
*[http://www.margaretthatcher.org/archive/cps2.asp Margaret Thatcher & the Centre for Policy Studies, 1974-79], Margaret Thatcher Foundation.
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
[[Category:think Tanks]]
 +
[[Category:Neoliberal Organisation]][[Category:Conservative movement]][[Category:Financial sector lobbying]][[Category:Fracking]]

Revision as of 11:39, 27 January 2017

CPS, 57 Tufton Street, Westminster - next door to think-tank Civitas

The Centre for Policy Studies is the free market think tank set up by Sir Keith Joseph which is most associated with the rise of Margaret Thatcher. During Margaret Thatcher's tenure as Prime Minister, the CPS enjoyed a considerable influence over policy, which declined rapidly following the departure of Keith Joseph from government in 1986, and Thatcher's removal in 1990.

The CPS 'develops and publishes public policy proposals and arranges seminars and lectures on topical policy issues, as part of its mission to influence policy around the world. It also maintains a range of informal contacts with politicians, policymakers, civil servants and the press, in Britain and abroad' and 'can claim a large share of the credit for initiating policies such as privatisation, trade union reform, council house sales, pensions deregulation, education reform, free trade, health service reform and the recent restructuring of the tax system to favour traditional families.'

History

CPS was set up in 1974 by Margaret Thatcher, Keith Joseph and Alfred Sherman. Sir Keith Joseph was the founder of the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) and the President was Margaret Thatcher. The full-time director was Alfred Sherman, who had started his political life on the extreme left. Keith Joseph, who was head of policy at the Conservative Party between 1975 and its successful election in 1979, was strongly influenced by the Institute of Economic Affairs. He helped set up the CPS as a kind of politicized version of the IEA, with the aim of promulgating its ideals around the political establishment - in particular, around the Conservative Party. [1] Some controversy surrounds the way the CPS was set up:

It was a fraud. Keith Joseph went to Ted and asked his permission to set up a fund to see how private enterprise worked in other countries. Then he went round the City saying he had Heath’s permission to raise the money. Then it became the Joseph/Thatcher power base for attacking everything Ted stood for.[2]

The CPS very quickly became the centre for the propagation of anti-Heath views — notoriously stage-managed at Joseph’s Preston Town Hall Speech on September 1974, which advocated greater unemployment to tackle inflation — as a challenge to his leadership.

With offices in Westminster it was the base for publishing books and pamphlets on monetarism and right-wing ideology, the speeches of Thatcher and Joseph, Samuel Brittan and others. According to the Guardian: ‘In those “heroic” days it was little more than an office employing Sherman to draft speeches for Joseph. It attracted a number of people who had not been active Tories but became influential later, notably David Young (later Lord Young of Graffham) and John (later Sir) Hoskyns.’ [3]

The CPS became the formal political manifestation of the ideology that had so far been propagated by the nominally independent Institute of Economic Affairs. Both were in the propaganda business. Both had offices in relatively unassuming private houses in S.W.1. Both poured out a stream of publications designed partly to reassure the faithful but first and foremost to proselytize.[4]

The CPS concentrated its propaganda on the universities, while the IEA tried to influence ‘Fleet Street’ and the City. The “economics” propounded by the IEA, which were openly taken up by the Conservative government in 1982, were, inter alia:

… more denationalisation of industry; an extension of private medicine; the introduction of education vouchers...; and more anti-union legislation.[5]

Founded in the 1950s by Lord Ralph Harris, the IEA was the first organisation in the UK to publish Milton Friedman’s monetarist economics. According to investigative journalists it later took an active part in the cabals which covertly drove the Conservative party rightwards in the 1970s, in alliance with the ultras in the Secret Service.[6] Arthur Seldon, deputy for Lord Harris wrote a book with the notorious MI6/CIA operative, Brian Crozier, who was involved in various nefarious covert operations through pan-European far right organisations such as “the 61” and the Pinay Circle. Lord Harris himself shared a platform with Crozier and John Gouriet of the Freedom Association (founded by the McWhirter twins) addressing the officers of the Army Staff College at Camberly circa 1975. This was an effort to encourage direct military intervention against “internal subversion (i.e. the left).[7]

The IEA are well known for their work in the field of privatisation. It was they who commissioned Stephen Littlechild in 1981 to write the paper “Ten steps to denationalisation,” Littlechild later became one of the four “regulators” who overseen 20% of the UK’s GDP in the form of the four utilities Gas, Water, Electricity and Telecommunications. They also influenced the Conservative Government’s minimum wage policy,[8] promoted the notion that “non-traditional” families (i.e. black and Asian) produce more delinquent children and advocating that “student loans should be charged at a higher rate of interest.”[9] Mrs Thatcher herself stated that:

What we have achieved could never have been done without the leadership of the IEA.[10]

In a March 2009 presentation Tim Montgomerie and Matthew Elliott described CPS as part of the infrastructure of the conservative movement in Britain.[11]

Funding

The Institute for Policy Research's 2005 Accounts reveal grants to CPS for £157,000.[12]

Climate Change

In the Telegraph in 2006, CPS director Ruth Lea suggested that we need not worry about climate change because, when the earth’s climate changed before, it gave rise to civilization (Lea, 2006). She was denounced by the man whose research she claimed to be championing. Nick Brooks of the University of East Anglia suggested that she had wilfully misinterpreted his work. “The distortion of science for ideological purposes,” he wrote, “has a long history, and the results are generally ugly.”[13]

George Monbiot argued that this was part of a disinformation campaign.[14] The Royal Society’s president, Lord Rees, sent the Telegraph what must be one of the most damning letters it has ever received.

In her sixth article in five months which misrepresents the science of climate change in the Business Pages of The Daily Telegraph, Ruth Lea erroneously asserts that “there is wide scientific disagreement” about the likely impact of climate change.[15] In fact, the peer-reviewed scientific literature, of which Lea appears to be completely unaware, shows that continued growth in greenhouse gas emissions will lead to a rise in global average temperature of between 1.4 and 5.8 centigrade degrees by 2100….[16]

Monbiot revealed the campaign of disinformation was started by the tobacco company Philip Morris in a convoluted attempt to distract attention from its funding of a campaign to deny the effects of tobacco by funding people to deny climate change as well. This heavily-funded lobby has produced some odd bedfellows, such as the Revolutionary Communist party (RCP) who have traveled from the fringes of the left to the extremities of the pro-corporate libertarian right:

In 1988, it set up a magazine called Living Marxism, later LM. By this time, the organisation, led by the academic Frank Furedi, the journalist Mick Hume and the teacher Claire Fox, had moved overtly to the far right. LM described its mission as promoting a “confident individualism” without social constraint […] It campaigned against gun control, […] against banning tobacco advertising […] and child pornography, […] and in favour of global warming, […] human cloning and freedom for corporations. It defended the Tory MP Neil Hamilton […] and the Bosnian Serb ethnic cleansers. […] It provided a platform for writers from the corporate thinktanks the Institute for Economic Affairs […] and the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. […] Frank Furedi started writing for the Centre for Policy Studies […] and contacting the supermarket chains, offering, for £7,500, to educate their customers “about complex scientific issues”.[17]

Against the Tobin Tax

In April 2012 the CPS published a report arguing against the proposed EU-wide Financial Transactions Tax, which was launched at an event entitled: Tobin Tax: golden egg or dead goose?. Participants included Andrew Tyrie MP, Chairman of the Treasury Select Committee; Roger Liddle, former adviser to President Barroso, Kay Swinburne MEP; Iain Anderson of Cicero Consulting and the report's author John Chown (leading tax expert and co-founder of the Institute for Fiscal Studies). [18]

Pro-Fracking

FrackWell.png This article is part of the Spinwatch Fracking Portal and project

In June 2014 the think tank warned that measures in the Queen's Speech had not gone far enough to encourage investment in unconventional gas production. It said Britain risked being 'held economic hostage by Russia' unless the country embraces fracking, given its growing dependence on foreign imports for almost every form of fossil fuel, from coal to natural gas. [19]

This followed its release of an earlier report by Richard and Elizabeth Muller in January 2014 which argued that serious environmentalists needed to rethink their opposition to fracking based on the immediate dangers posed by air pollution rather than the 'distant' long-term threat of global warming. [20]

People

Previous employees

Board of Directors

Centre for Policy Studies Council

Resources

Notes

  1. PBS, Command Heights, Interview with Lord Ralph Harris, 17 July 2000.
  2. Keegan, W. (1984) Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment, Penguin: 47
  3. Sir Alfred Sherman – Adviser who preached Thatcherism before the term was invented’, Guardian, 29 August 2006
  4. Keegan, W. (1984) Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment, Penguin: 60
  5. Keegan, W. (1984) Mrs Thatcher’s Economic Experiment, Penguin: ??
  6. Dorril, S. & Ramsay, R. (1991) Smear!, 4th Estate: 224 – 228
  7. Crozier, B. R. (1993) Free Agent, Harper Collins. 122
  8. Sunday Times 19/2/95.
  9. Financial Times 9/1/95.
  10. Spectator 23/4/88
  11. Tim Montgomerie, The growth of Britain's conservative movement, ConservativeHome, 14 March 2009.
  12. The Institute for Policy Research Report and Accounts, Year ended 30 September 2005, Charity number 285143. Accessible via: http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/DocumentList.aspx?RegisteredCharityNumber=285143&SubsidiaryNumber=0&DocType=AccountList
  13. Brooks, N. (2006) Global Warning, Letter to the Telegraph, September 13.
  14. Monbiot, G. (2003) Invasion of the Entryists, Guardian, December 9.
  15. Lea, R. (2006) Costly futile gestures in the climate change debate, The Telegraph. September 11.
  16. Rees, Lord of Ludlow (2006) Letter sent to the Telegraph, September 18.
  17. Monbiot, G. (2003) Invasion of the Entryists, Guardian, December 9.
  18. Centre for Policy Studies, Time to Bin the Tobin Tax, published 23 April 2012, accessed April 26 2012
  19. Andrew Critchlow Get Britain fracking or be held hostage by Russia, says think tank, The Telegraph, 7:00PM BST 08 Jun 2014, acc 9 June 2014
  20. RICHARD A. MULLER AND ELIZABETH A. MULLER, [http://www.cps.org.uk/files/reports/original/131202135150-WhyEverySeriousEnvironmentalistShouldFavourFracking.pdf 'Why Every Serious Environmentalist should favour Fracking', Centre for Policy Studies, 2014
  21. Tim Montgomerie,Tim Knox is the new Director of the Centre for Policy Studies, conservativehome, 14 July 2011, accessed 18 July 2011