Difference between revisions of "British Science Association"
m |
(→Nuclear coverage) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:The incident at Fukushima following the tsunami of March 2011 left behind it a trail of confusion and misinformation. Two years on, we now have the benefit of hindsight to evaluate exactly what happened and bring to you the real story of Fukushima. | :The incident at Fukushima following the tsunami of March 2011 left behind it a trail of confusion and misinformation. Two years on, we now have the benefit of hindsight to evaluate exactly what happened and bring to you the real story of Fukushima. | ||
| − | The programme | + | The programme: |
15:30 Talk: The nuclear physics of Fukushima | 15:30 Talk: The nuclear physics of Fukushima | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
===Polling on public attitudes to nuclear power=== | ===Polling on public attitudes to nuclear power=== | ||
| − | + | In a comment piece on the BSA's polling of British attitudes to nuclear power six months after the Fukushima disaster, Nick Pidgeon, professor of applied psychology at Cardiff University, pointed out that | |
| + | |||
| + | :Globally, the picture is rather different. An Ipsos poll carried out after Fukushima found that global support for nuclear energy has dropped from 54 per cent to 38 per cent, fuelled by a 26 per cent jump in new opponents to nuclear power who say that Fukushima caused their decision. Particularly high levels of opposition were found in both Germany and Japan. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Globally, only 31 per cent support new nuclear build. This average hides big differences between countries, with only 11 per cent of Brazilians supporting compared with 52 per cent of Poles. In Britain, the figure is 43 per cent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Research shows that people will be more accepting of nuclear power if they trust the people in charge. One component of that trust is how they perceive these people’s communication. The same Ipsos poll found that, globally, 54 per cent of people assessed Japanese officials’ and institutions’ communications to be honest and 56 per cent assessed them as timely. However, in Japan itself, only 28 per cent agreed that communications were honest and only 23 per cent that they were timely. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pidgeon concluded: | ||
| + | The events at Fukushima show us that, with any highly complex hazardous technology, accidents can always happen – something the sociologist Charles Perrow many years ago called a ‘Normal Accident’. | ||
| + | While the impacts of the Tsunami have been a tragedy for the people of Japan, this should not deter us from drawing the right lessons from the Fukushima disaster. It would be a mistake to approach community engagement without acknowledging that some profound lessons have to be learned - including that this technology remains very dangerous. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <ref>Learning the lessons of Fukushima | ||
==Affiliations== | ==Affiliations== | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 11 October 2013
|
This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch. |
Contents
Background
The British Science Association (BSA) is a registered charity that 'exists to advance the public understanding, accessibility and accountability of the sciences and engineering in the UK'.
Nuclear coverage
Events
In September 2013 the BSA's Physics and Astronomy section organised a free panel discussion entitled, 'Fukushima two years on: The real story'. Those attending, it claimed, would be able to 'Find out the facts about the Fukushima incident in 2011 and implications on the future of energy generation'.
- The incident at Fukushima following the tsunami of March 2011 left behind it a trail of confusion and misinformation. Two years on, we now have the benefit of hindsight to evaluate exactly what happened and bring to you the real story of Fukushima.
The programme:
15:30 Talk: The nuclear physics of Fukushima Participants: Paddy Regan 16:00 Talk: Radiation and risk at Fukushima Participants: Steven Judge 16:30 Talk: Concerns and lessons learned from Fukushima Participants: Paul Dorfman 17:00 Questions and Answers: Discussion / questions Participants: Paul Dorfman, Paddy Regan, Steven Judge
Polling on public attitudes to nuclear power
In a comment piece on the BSA's polling of British attitudes to nuclear power six months after the Fukushima disaster, Nick Pidgeon, professor of applied psychology at Cardiff University, pointed out that
- Globally, the picture is rather different. An Ipsos poll carried out after Fukushima found that global support for nuclear energy has dropped from 54 per cent to 38 per cent, fuelled by a 26 per cent jump in new opponents to nuclear power who say that Fukushima caused their decision. Particularly high levels of opposition were found in both Germany and Japan.
- Globally, only 31 per cent support new nuclear build. This average hides big differences between countries, with only 11 per cent of Brazilians supporting compared with 52 per cent of Poles. In Britain, the figure is 43 per cent.
- Research shows that people will be more accepting of nuclear power if they trust the people in charge. One component of that trust is how they perceive these people’s communication. The same Ipsos poll found that, globally, 54 per cent of people assessed Japanese officials’ and institutions’ communications to be honest and 56 per cent assessed them as timely. However, in Japan itself, only 28 per cent agreed that communications were honest and only 23 per cent that they were timely.
Pidgeon concluded: The events at Fukushima show us that, with any highly complex hazardous technology, accidents can always happen – something the sociologist Charles Perrow many years ago called a ‘Normal Accident’. While the impacts of the Tsunami have been a tragedy for the people of Japan, this should not deter us from drawing the right lessons from the Fukushima disaster. It would be a mistake to approach community engagement without acknowledging that some profound lessons have to be learned - including that this technology remains very dangerous.
<ref>Learning the lessons of Fukushima
Affiliations
People
Funding
Contact, Resources and Notes
Contact
