Difference between revisions of "Bernard Ingham"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
On his retirement in 1991, BNFL “asked him to make his advice available as a consultant� (The Independent, December 30, 1991). The company did not disclose how much it paid him.
 
On his retirement in 1991, BNFL “asked him to make his advice available as a consultant� (The Independent, December 30, 1991). The company did not disclose how much it paid him.
  
Ingham is also now a runs the pro-nuclear lobbying group Sup, having worked as a paid consultant for the nuclear industry.
+
Ingham was also a director of [[Hill and Knowlton]], one of the largest public relations companies in Britain, from September 1991 to June 2002. The firm has very close links with the Government and worked for Nuclear Electric during the 1990s.
 
 
Ingham was also a director of [LINK] Hill and Knowlton, one of the largest public relations companies in Britain, from September 1991 to June 2002. The firm has very close links with the Government and worked for Nuclear Electric during the 1990s.
 
  
 
In PR Week, September 16, 1993, Ingham was quoted as saying “for 25 years I have earned a crust trying to preserve nuclear power�.
 
In PR Week, September 16, 1993, Ingham was quoted as saying “for 25 years I have earned a crust trying to preserve nuclear power�.
  
No longer working for BNFL, Ingham is now director and secretary of pro-nuclear lobbying group Supporters of Nuclear Energy (SONE) alongside [LINK] Sir Christopher Harding, the former chairman of BNFL. Its business address is the Westminster headquarters of the British Nuclear Energy Society, a body set up to promote nuclear power and linked to all the main figures in the nuclear industry, from BNFL to British Energy, the company which runs most of the country's nuclear power stations (www.sone.org.uk/content/view/42/31/ and http://archive.corporatewatch.org/newsletter/issue21/issue21_part2.htm).
+
No longer working for BNFL, Ingham is the secretary of pro-nuclear lobbying group [[Supporters of Nuclear Energy]] (SONE). Its business address is the Westminster headquarters of the British Nuclear Energy Society, a body set up to promote nuclear power and linked to all the main figures in the nuclear industry, from BNFL to British Energy, the company which runs most of the country's nuclear power stations (www.sone.org.uk/content/view/42/31/ and http://archive.corporatewatch.org/newsletter/issue21/issue21_part2.htm).
  
 
Line many pro-nuclear campaigners, Ingham is virulently anti-wind power. He has been vice-president of the anti-wind farm campaign Country Guardian since summer 1993. His stance on nuclear versus wind power is clear: in 1993 he wrote a column in the Hebden Bridge Times entitled ‘Nuclear power is greener than windfarms’.
 
Line many pro-nuclear campaigners, Ingham is virulently anti-wind power. He has been vice-president of the anti-wind farm campaign Country Guardian since summer 1993. His stance on nuclear versus wind power is clear: in 1993 he wrote a column in the Hebden Bridge Times entitled ‘Nuclear power is greener than windfarms’.
Line 29: Line 27:
 
He is also an avowed anti-European
 
He is also an avowed anti-European
  
 
He is secretary of [[Supporters of Nuclear Energy]] (SONE), a pro-nuclear energy lobbying group with strong links to the [[British Nuclear Energy Society]] [http://www.sone.org.uk/content/view/42/31/] [http://archive.corporatewatch.org/newsletter/issue21/issue21_part2.htm].
 
 
Like many pro-nulcear activists, Ingham is vehemently anti-wind energy. He has been the Vice-President of the anti-wind pressure group Country Gaurdian since the summer of 1993, although he claims that he only became a Country Guardian patron in 1999.
 
 
Ingham’s stance on nuclear vs wind is clear from his speeches and writings. As far back as 1993 he wrote a column in the Hebden Bridge Times entitled ‘Nuclear power is greener than windfarms’.
 
 
He is also a global warming skeptic. At an anti-wind conference at Saddleworth Moors organised by Country Guardian in 2004 he said: “I am a skeptic about global warming�; “wind will never compete with nuclear�; “windpower is for the brainwashed or the braindead. Wind “is not an answer to global warming�; “nuclear is benign on two counts: pollution and land-use�.
 
 
He also argues that energy conservation is no solution, because people are only motivated to save money on bills, rather than saving energy itself. He argues that all people do when they save money is simply buy more electrical goods which use more energy. “Having been responsible for the [Save It] policy, I wouldn’t rely on energy conservation to get me through�. “My solution to this problem… is a mix of energy supply: coal, nuclear, oil and gas� – he also says that most oil comes from unstable regimes and nuclear is the safest form of energy production.
 
 
Ingham also repeats the often anti-environemental argument that puts forward the theory that groups “want to return to a pre-industrial society�.
 
 
REF FOR SADDLEWORTH
 
 
On the [[Today programme]] on November 29, 2005, Ingham claimed that nuclear power is "the cheapest option" and "the cleanest of all methods of electricity generation", and dismissed windpower as "unreliable, intermittent, and therefore basically mucky". He also claimed that "nuclear doesn't want subsidies". [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today4_nuclearpower_20051129.ram]  [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4481380.stm]
 
 
Ingham is an avowed anti-European.
 
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 14:51, 4 January 2006

Sir Bernard Ingham

History

Sir Bernard Ingham is a journalist who worked as press secretary for Margaret Thatcher. He joined the Civil Service in 1967, working for the Department of Energy from 1974. He went on to spend eleven years as Thatcher's Chief Press Secretary. From 1989-90 Ingham was also Head of the Government Information Service.

Links to the nuclear industry

On his retirement in 1991, BNFL “asked him to make his advice available as a consultant� (The Independent, December 30, 1991). The company did not disclose how much it paid him.

Ingham was also a director of Hill and Knowlton, one of the largest public relations companies in Britain, from September 1991 to June 2002. The firm has very close links with the Government and worked for Nuclear Electric during the 1990s.

In PR Week, September 16, 1993, Ingham was quoted as saying “for 25 years I have earned a crust trying to preserve nuclear power�.

No longer working for BNFL, Ingham is the secretary of pro-nuclear lobbying group Supporters of Nuclear Energy (SONE). Its business address is the Westminster headquarters of the British Nuclear Energy Society, a body set up to promote nuclear power and linked to all the main figures in the nuclear industry, from BNFL to British Energy, the company which runs most of the country's nuclear power stations (www.sone.org.uk/content/view/42/31/ and http://archive.corporatewatch.org/newsletter/issue21/issue21_part2.htm).

Line many pro-nuclear campaigners, Ingham is virulently anti-wind power. He has been vice-president of the anti-wind farm campaign Country Guardian since summer 1993. His stance on nuclear versus wind power is clear: in 1993 he wrote a column in the Hebden Bridge Times entitled ‘Nuclear power is greener than windfarms’.

He is also a global warming skeptic. At a major meeting of anti-windfarm campaigners, on June 19, 2004 at Saddleworth Moor in Lancashire, he said: “I am a skeptic about global warming�; “wind will never compete with nuclear�; “windpower is for the brainwashed or the braindead. Wind “is not an answer to global warming�; “nuclear is benign on two counts: pollution and land-use�.

He also argues that energy conservation is no solution, because people are only motivated to save money on bills, rather than saving energy itself. He argues that all people do when they save money is simply buy more electrical goods which use more energy. “Having been responsible for the [Save It] policy, I wouldn’t rely on energy conservation to get me through�. “My solution to this problem… is a mix of energy supply: coal, nuclear, oil and gas� – he also says that most oil comes from unstable regimes and nuclear is the safest form of energy production.

Ingham also repeats the often anti-environmental argument that puts forward the theory that groups “want to return to a pre-industrial society�.

On the Today programme on November 29, 2005, Ingham claimed that nuclear power is "the cheapest option" and "the cleanest of all methods of electricity generation", and dismissed windpower as "unreliable, intermittent, and therefore basically mucky". He also claimed that "nuclear doesn't want subsidies". [3] (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today4_nuclearpower_20051129.ram) [4] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4481380.stm)

He is also an avowed anti-European


External links

Articles