Difference between revisions of "Powerbase:Free Software"
(new page) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''software libre''' or '''Free Software''' movement is the philosophy that software, as a form of communication, needs to flow freely without being owned. It is not a form of property. | The '''software libre''' or '''Free Software''' movement is the philosophy that software, as a form of communication, needs to flow freely without being owned. It is not a form of property. | ||
| − | The capitalized term '''Free Software''' is defined by GNU/FSF and typically denotes the "movement" while | + | The capitalized term '''Free Software''' is defined by GNU/FSF and typically denotes the "movement" while '''free software''' denotes the software itself. It is also possible to take "free software" as an imperative, i.e. a demand to free it. |
To facilitate this freedom of flow, and ability to share changes with others, specific licenses with [[SpinProfiles:Share-alike|share-alike]] terms have evolved. This includes the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License GNU General Public License] and the more recent [[SpinProfiles:Creative Commons|Creative Commons]] suite. | To facilitate this freedom of flow, and ability to share changes with others, specific licenses with [[SpinProfiles:Share-alike|share-alike]] terms have evolved. This includes the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License GNU General Public License] and the more recent [[SpinProfiles:Creative Commons|Creative Commons]] suite. | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 2 October 2007
The software libre or Free Software movement is the philosophy that software, as a form of communication, needs to flow freely without being owned. It is not a form of property.
The capitalized term Free Software is defined by GNU/FSF and typically denotes the "movement" while free software denotes the software itself. It is also possible to take "free software" as an imperative, i.e. a demand to free it.
To facilitate this freedom of flow, and ability to share changes with others, specific licenses with share-alike terms have evolved. This includes the GNU General Public License and the more recent Creative Commons suite.
The Open Source movement by contrast allows for owning improvements and refusing to share them, but builds on a base of relatively free software to enable cooperation and interchange.
Most "open" licenses do not require share-alike and some make it quite difficult. Much open source software is in use today and the Internet is in general built on it, with many vendors offering major enhancements, some of which they have "protected" and "own" (forbidden in the 'free software' model and quite difficult in any share-alike model if they thereby restrict other users from using those improvements or changes).
Despite this major difference, many people confuse "free" with "open". It does not help that open content is actually more share-alike than it is Open Source.
Microsoft's "software ecosystem" rhetoric was largely constructed to counter the free software rhetoric, in particular to defeat Linux as an economic force.
Other SpinProfiles resources
External Links
- [1] wikipedia article on GNU General Public License
